BMLW5103 Business Law Assessment Help
Do you want BMLW5103 Business Law Assessment Answers Help by professional PhD/MBA writers? We are providing online BMLW5103 Business Law Assignment Help at an affordable price. Assignment Help AUS delivers quality and creative assignment writing to its customer. We also offer Law Assessment Help with the best quality work. Hurry up, get the best assignments. Place your order now!
Assignment Details:
- Words: 5000
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
Part I
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this assignment is to assess the understanding of the students on the application of the law of partnership in business environments. Every partner is considered an agent to one another to ease the operation of the partnership business. However, this may also pose a problem when partners cannot mutually agree on their terms of reference in the partnership. Students are required to look into the issues, evaluate them and recommend better solutions to the parties.
REQUIREMENT:
1. Students have to identify the main issues regarding the relationship between partners in relation to their roles as agents and their terms of reference, identify relevant principles from the Partnership Act 1961 and the Contracts Act 1950 and apply the relevant principles to the issue, supported by examples and cases.
2. Students are expected to provide their recommendations and conclusion based on the discussion.
Part II
ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION
Discuss the following topic(s) in the forum and submit proof of your participation in the online discussions:
Provide your answer and view on the following topic of discussion.
a. There are several elements needed for an agreement to be a valid contract. Explain TWO of the elements.
b. Discuss several types of remedies available for the innocent party when there is a breach of contract.
Part I
| *QN | CLO | Criteria | Weight | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max Marks |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| 1 | 1 | Introduction to the concept of partnership and how it is formed
|
1.5 | Very clear and detailed introduction. Able to refer to relevant Acts
|
Clear introduction. Able to refer to relevant Acts | Quite clear introduction. Able to refer to relevant Acts | Vague introduction. Not able to refer to relevant Acts | No introduction was given | 6 |
| 1 | 1 | Main issues regarding the relationship between partners in relation to their roles as agents and their terms of reference:
i. Are they provided for in the Partnership Act 1961 and the Contracts Act 1950? ii. If not, how do we determine the above issues? |
2 | Very clear and detailed discussion. Able to support with relevant principles from the Partnership Act 1961 and the Contracts Act 1950 | Clear discussion. Able to support with relevant principles from the Partnership Act 1961 and the Contracts Act 1950 | Quite clear discussion. Able to support with relevant principles from the Partnership Act 1961 and the Contracts Act 1950 | Vague discussion. Not able to support with relevant principles from the Partnership Act 1961 and the Contracts Act 1950 | No discussion was given. | 8 |
| 1 | 1 | Relevant principles from the Partnership Act 1961
o The Partnership Act 1961 does contain provisions on the relationship between partners, but the scope as far the general principle of agency is concerned needs to be read with the Contracts Act 1950 o In resolving such issues, here and there in the Partnership Act 1961 the words “in the absence of any agreement to the contrary”, which indicates that partners are free to mutually decide on their terms of reference in the partnership o Such an agreement, if it is properly documented, will assist partners in understanding their terms of reference
|
3 | Identification and explanation of relevant principles from the Partnership Act 1961 was very comprehensive
|
Identification and explanation of relevant principles from the Partnership Act 1961 was comprehensive | Identification and explanation of relevant principles from the Partnership Act 1961 was quite comprehensive | Identification and explanation of irrelevant principles were brief | No identification and explanation of principles was given | 12 |
| 1 | 3 | Application of the above relevant principles to the issues, supported by examples and cases
|
2 | Clear and detailed application, examples and cases. | Clear application, examples and cases. | Quite clear application, examples and cases. | Vague application, examples and cases. | No application, examples and cases was given. | 8 |
| 1 | 3 | Recommendations for better solutions to the parties.
|
3 | THREE feasible recommendations. | TWO feasible recommendations. | ONE feasible recommendation. | Recommendations given were irrevant. | No recommendation was given. | 12 |
| 1 | 3 | Conclusion
|
1 | Conclusion reflects the overall contents of the assignment. | Conclusion reflects the major contents of the assignment. | Conclusion briefly reflects some contents of the assignment.
|
Conclusion does not reflect the contents of the assignment. | No conclusion was given. | 4 |
| Total | 12.5 | 50 | |||||||
Part II ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION
| *QN | CLO | Criteria | Weight | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max Marks |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| 2 | 3 | Quality of Postings
Affective Domain |
2.5 | All five comments are very good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful,
respectful |
Four of the comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful,
respectful
|
Three of the comments are somewhat good and appropriate and meaningful
|
None of the comments are good and relevant. / One or Two Comments are only short responses that are not substantial nor meaningful. Minimum effort (e.g. “I agree with Tina”)
|
No postings submitted
|
10 |
| Total | 2.5 | 10 | |||||||
Part II ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION
| QN | CLO | Criteria | Weightage | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max marks |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| Quality of Postings
|
2.5
|
All five comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful, and
respectful
|
Three or four of the comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful and
respectful
|
One or two of the comments are somewhat good, appropriate, meaningful and
respectful
|
None of the comments are good and relevant. / Comments are short responses that are not substantial nor meaningful. Minimum effort (e.g. “I agree with Tina”)
|
No postings given as proof of participation in discussion
|
10 | ||
| Total Marks | 10 |
For REF… Use: #getanswers2002216 C