TUTOR MARKED ASSESSMENT – FALL 2021-2022, SEMESTER 1
Get Assessment Answers on Supply Chain Management Assignment for Faculty Business Studies – MBA from Experts. Assignment Help AUS is No.1 New Assignment Solutions Provider in Australia and Worldwide with 100% Unique Content. We have a group of 100+ PhD level assignment expert writers who provide qualitative online assignment help to students from Australia. You can try any of our management assignment help services related to custom essay help, assignment writing help, dissertation writing service and many more.
TMA Objective
The objective of BB849 TMA 01 is to understand and analyze the new trends in supply chain management. Please prepare your views on the questions considering the information presented in the course materials. Your answers must defend your point of view with due justification from the literature wherever possible.
Question (Up to 100% Marks): (2500 words +/- 10 %)
The supply chain continues to evolve rapidly, keeping pace with the breakneck technological advancements of the modern era. Though it can be difficult for supply chain managers and business leaders to stay on top of these changes, it’s crucial to do so if you want to maintain the integrity of supply chain and see that business succeed. Rather than treading on the heels of change, every organization should try to get ahead of the trends that are shaping the future of supply chain management.
Search and Collect 10 research articles published during the period from 2016 to 2021 in leading business journals relating to recent trends in supply chain management such as Artificial Intelligence & Automation in Supply Chain, Supply Chain Sustainability, Supply Chain Customization, Supply Network Optimization, Supply Chain Analytics, Reverse Supply Chains and Industry in Supply Chains in consultation with your tutor. Review the article and critically address the following questions.
Choose any two trends in supply chain of your choice from the above list and critically analyze how every organization should get ahead of the trends that are shaping the future of supply chain management.
Assessment criterion | Description |
Engagement with theory |
In all TMA submissions students should be engaging with concepts, frameworks, models and theories which are drawn from their work on the relevant units of the module. They should always explain the theory, rather than list bullet points. Bullet points do not demonstrate an understanding of the ideas, but rather display memory only. Students must show you that they have fully grasped and presented the ideas in their terms, not only that they can repeat them. |
Use of evidence |
Evidence will inform both the way that students critique theory and how they demonstrate their understanding of it. They should give practical examples from their own experiences and practice, or an organisation they know well, in order to provide strong evidence for their arguments. Likewise, they can offer evidence and illustrations for their arguments from the module materials. They must always link their examples to theory, otherwise it is just description and not analysis. They should attempt to weave the theory and evidence together, rather than having large chunks of text about the theory and then large chunks of text about ‘evidence’, as the latter inevitably ends up being descriptive rather than analytical and can feel contrived and difficult to write. |
Level of discussion |
At Masters level, simple answers and essentially descriptive reports are not adequate. Student TMA submissions should present a level of discussion in which their consideration of evidence and theory takes account of competing positions and elements of contrast, comparison and evaluation. Their work should demonstrate a Masters’ level of critical analysis, where appropriate. The dialogue between theory and practice should inform their discussions. They should develop the arguments they are making and situate them in relation to other views and perspectives, which may be supported (or not supported) by the theory. They need to be sure that they answer the question set! |
Marks Distribution
This assignment will be graded out of 100 marks, which will be allocated to your answer for the three questions. 20% will be deducted based on the following criteria:
- 10% for improper referencing (5% in-text referencing and 5% end-text references).
- 10% for non-adherence to specified word count & improper
Word count for TMA submissions
- The overall word count is 2500 words (+/- 10%) (Excluding References).
TMA Guidance
- Students are expected to search articles from the top marketing journals such as the Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Marketing Today, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, International Marketing Review, Marketing Science, International Journal of Research in Marketing,
- Students are encouraged to explore innovative and high impact marketing journal articles from our AOU e-library. The choice of the article can be discussed with the tutor to avoid overlapping between
- Critical discussion and link between theoretical frameworks and the article should be clearly You should take a critical approach, try to be creative in your response, and avoid descriptive answers.
- Students are expected to refer to external references to provide more evidence for their External resources can be related to the case/article, or they can be not directly related to it yet help to add to the analysis and discussion.
Generic Assessment Criteria
Indicative Grade | %
Marks |
Characteristics | |
A | 86 and above | High standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks
Excellent understanding and exposition of relevant issues Clearly structured and logically developed arguments |
Outstanding
Student meets all requirements of LOs. The student demonstrates an excellent grasp of the subject knowledge including critical thinking and consistently adheres to the conventions of writing. The student demonstrates outstanding ability in use of relevant ideas / facts / theories / concepts / |
Indicative Grade | %
Marks |
Characteristics | |
Good awareness of nuances and complexities
Substantial evidence of well- executed independent research Very good evaluation and synthesis of source material Very good use of relevant data and examples, all properly referenced |
models / perspectives with consistency and precision of breadth and depth. The student work is strikingly insightful with evidence of originality and integration of information from sources with sound judgment and professional standards of writing with further scope for research. | ||
B+ | 80-85 | Very good standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks
Clear awareness and exposition of relevant issues Clearly structured and logically developed argument Awareness of concepts and complexities Evidence of independent research Good evaluation and synthesis of source material Good use of relevant data and examples, all properly referenced |
Very Good
Student meets all requirements of LOs. The student demonstrates a very good grasp of the subject knowledge and consistently adheres to the conventions of writing. The student demonstrates high ability in use of relevant ideas / facts / theories / concepts / models / perspectives with consistency and precision of breadth and depth. The students work is insightful with evidence of originality to a great extent and integration of information from sources with sound judgment and professional standards of writing. |
B | 75-79 | Uses appropriate conceptual frameworks
Attempts analysis but includes some errors and/or omissions Shows awareness of issues but no more than to be expected from attendance at classes Arguments reasonably clear but underdeveloped Insufficient evaluation of source material Some good use of relevant data and examples, but incompletely referenced Insufficient evidence of independent research |
|
C+
Probation |
70-74 | Adequate understanding of appropriate conceptual frameworks Answer too descriptive and/or any attempt at analysis is superficial, containing errors and/or omissions Shows limited awareness of issues but also some confusion Arguments not particularly clear Limited evidence of independent research and reliance on a superficial repeat of class notes Relatively superficial use of
relevant data, sources and examples and poorly referenced |
Good Student meets nearly all requirements of LOs. The student demonstrates an sound grasp of the subject knowledge and adheres to the conventions of writing. The student demonstrates ability in use of relevant ideas / facts / theories / concepts / models / perspectives with consistency and precision of breadth and depth. The student work is has fair evidence of originality and integration of information from sources with judgment and appropriate standards of writing. |
Indicative Grade | %
Marks |
Characteristics | |
C | 60-69 | Shows acquaintance with and understanding of key concepts and issues from a range of sources; ideas synthesized and related to the topic. Ideas organized and grouped into a coherent argument; use of examples / detail / quotations / references / experience to support argument; some critical analysis of ideas/ evidence; limited appraisal of
implications. |
|
D | 50-59 | Shows general understanding of key concepts and issues. Ideas organized and grouped into a coherent argument; use of examples
/ experience to support argument; limited appraisal of implications. |
Satisfactory
Student fairly meets requirements of LOs. The student demonstrates fair level of knowledge but with weak competency in presenting the argument. Adheres to broad standards of writing and lacks in presentation of knowledge in depth and breadth. |
F | Below 50 | Unsatisfactory
Student fails to meet the LOs. The student demonstrates patchy overall knowledge of the subject. Lacks skills in presenting argument, contains inaccuracies with very little evidence of independent thought. |
Evaluation
The assignment will be evaluated on:
- The degree of insight offered, and the level of critical analysis applied (as compared to description).
- The link to concepts presented in the course (the quality of the link is critical, not the number of concepts used) and the use of well referenced external resources.
- Whether the recommendations are valuable, realistic, and well supported.
Harvard Style – References / bibliography How -to guide
Note: It is a requirement that all students include a header/footer of the following information on every single page of the TMA: Name, ID, Course Code, TMA #, Tutor name, section, and semester.
- You have to use the Times New Roman Font Size 12 (except for the cover page).
- Line spacing should be 1.5
- All pages should be numbered
- Keep wide margins for your instructors’ comments
- Align your text to the Don’t justify leaving spaces between words
Harvard Style Referencing:
- There are various ways of setting out references / bibliographies for an assignment.
- “Harvard Style” is a generic term for any referencing style which uses in-text references such as (Smith, 1999), and a reference list at the end of the document organized by author name and year of publication.
In this guide, we are using a “Harvard Style” which is based on the author-date system for books, articles and “non-books”.
NOTE: When you write your list of references/bibliography, please keep in mind the following points:
- Your bibliography should identify an item (e.g. book, journal article, cassette tape, film, or internet site) in sufficient detail so that others may identify it and consult
- Your bibliography should appear at the end of your TMA with entries listed
- If you have used sources from the Internet, these should be listed in your
FOR A BOOK
The details required in order are:
- name/s of author/s, editor/s, compiler/s or the institution responsible
- year of publication
- title of publication and subtitle if any (all titles must be underlined or italicized)
- series title and individual volume if any
- edition, if other than first
- publisher
- place of publication
- page number(s) if applicable
- One author
Berkman, RI 1994, Find it fast: how to uncover expert information on any subject, Harper Perennial, New York.
- Two or more authors:
Cengel, YA & Boles, MA 1994, Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, 2nd edn, McGraw Hill, London.
Cheek, J, Doskatsch, I, Hill, P & Walsh, L 1995, Finding out: information literacy for the 21st century, MacMillan Education Australia, South Melbourne.
- Editor(s)
Pike, ER & Sarkar, S (eds) 1986, Frontiers in quantum optics, Adam Hilger, Bristol. Jackson, JA (ed.) 1997, Glossary of geology, 4th edn, American Geological Institute, Alexandria, Va.
- Sponsored by institution, corporation or other organization
Institution of Engineers, Australia 1994, Code of ethics, Institution of Engineers, Australia, Barton, A.C.T
- Series
Bhattacharjee, M 1998, Notes of infinite permutation groups, Lecture notes in mathematics no.1698, Springer, New York.
- Edition
Zumdahl, SS 1997, Chemistry, 4th edn, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
- Chapter or part of a book to which a number of authors have contributed
Bernstein, D 1995, ‘Transportation planning’, in WF Chen (ed.), The civil engineering handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
- No author or editor
Kempe’s engineer’s year-book 1992, Morgan-Grampian, London.
FOR AN ARTICLE
The details required, in order, are:
- name/s of author/s of the article
- year of publication
- title of article, in single quotation marks
- title of periodical (underlined or italicised)
- volume number
- issue (or part) number
- page number(s)
- Journal article
Huffman, LM 1996, ‘Processing whey protein for use as a food ingredient’, Food Technology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 49-52
- Newspaper article
Simpson, L 1997, ‘Tasmania’s railway goes private‘, Australian Financial Review, 13 October, p. 10
FOR A NON- BOOK NON-BOOK
The details required are the same as for a book, with the form of the item (eg video recording, tape, computer file, etc.) indicated after the year.
Get the facts (and get them organized) 1990, video recording, Appleseed Productions, Williamstown, Vic
FORM OF ITEM
Dr. Brain thinking games 1998, CD-ROM, Knowledge Adventure Inc., Torrance, California
FOR WEB SITES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC SOURCES
- FOR WEB SITES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC SOURCES
- This could include sources from full text compact disk products, electronic journals or other sources from the Internet.
- The basic form of the citations follow the principles listed for print sources (see above)
- name/s of author/s
- date of publication Note: If you cannot establish the date of publication, use d. (no date).
- title of publication
- edition, if other than first
- type of medium, if necessary
- date item viewed
- name or site address on internet (if applicable)
Weibel, S 1995, ‘Metadata: the foundations of resource description’, D-lib Magazine, viewed 7 January 1997, <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/July95/07weibel.html>.
ASTEC 1994, The networked nation, Australian Science, Technology and Engineering Council,
Canberra, viewed 7 May 1997, <http://astec.gov.au/astec/net_nation/contents.html>
- If no author is given, the title is used as the first element of a
Dr. Brain thinking games 1998, CD-ROM, Knowledge Adventure Inc., Torrance, California
REFERENCES IN THE TEXT OF YOUR ESSAY FERENCES IN THE TEXT OF YOUR ESSAY
- In an author-date style, a textual citation generally requires only the name of the author(s) and the year of publication (and specific page(s) if necessary).
- This may appear at the end of a sentence, before the full stop.
Examples:
It is futile to maintain that the sexes are interchangeable (Moir & Jessel 1991).
It is futile to maintain that the sexes are interchangeable (Moir & Jessel 1991, p.94).
- Alternatively, the author’s surname may be integrated into the text, followed by the year of publication in
Examples:
Moir and Jessel (1991) have shown that it is futile to maintain that the sexes are interchangeable.
Moir and Jessel (1991, pp. 93-4) have shown that it is futile to maintain that the sexes are interchangeable.
- If two or more works by different authors are cited at the same time, separate them with a semicolon
Example:
The implications for land degradation have been much debated (Malinowski, Miller & Gupta 1995; Thomson 1999).
- If two or more works by the same author are cited at the same time, do not repeat the author’s Separate the years of publication by a comma.
- Alternatively, the author’s surname may be integrated into the text, followed by the year of publication in parentheses.
Example:
Subsequent investigation confirmed these results (Watson & Clark 1996, 1998). Public housing remains a neglected area (ACOSS 1997a, 1997b).
- If there are more than three authors, list only the first, followed by ‘et ‘ al.
Example:
Other researchers have questioned these findings (Larson et al. 1987).
- If you cannot establish the year of publication, use ‘n.d.’ (no date).
Example:
Recent advances have been made in this area (Bolton n.d.).
- If there is no author or authoring body, cite the work by title, in italics.
Example:
In military settings, leadership acquires a different significance (Be, know, do: leadership the Army way, 2004).
For REF… Use: #getanswers2001685